Is it a time to build a new “Motherland of man” to bring back humanity? The Virus project

Development of a new continent with new advanced technologies, that enable self-sufficiency; with appropriate social order and catarthical purification of inhabited human population; humanity will get a new “embryo” that will spread like a virus, impossible to stop or destroy.

pr7_slika2

THE VIRUS PROJECT  – revival of the idea of mystical land “Mu

Among the arts and all its forms, architecture is possibly the most responsible to humanity. Together they build civilizations and therefore architecture is responsible for the evolutionary development of our existence. It is possible to avoid other art forms, but it is impossible to avoid architecture. Architecture follows, guides and touches people every step of the way – either unknowingly or with its full power; without needing to go to the theater or read a book or visit a gallery, Architecture is and always will be the accompanying art of the governing class, who also depend on it, sometimes as a blind servant. This is clearly evident in architectural creations that have been used as a means of political manifestation and at times they are the peak of indoctrination of certain ideologies or repressions.

It is the mission, tendency and the duty of an architect to constantly look for something new. The architect and his or her creations must not be the reflection of current fashionable trends or be considered a tool in the hands of the governing class to quench its current governing thirst.

It appears that the current period of evolution is saturated; as though it were wandering aimlessly; as though it has lost its inner driving force. We need a solution to this torpid state, where architecture is unaware of its own destiny and lacks clear focus, with financial profit as the only magnified moral category. 

This solution does not involve a cataclysm or absolute redemption, but is to be found in ourselves. It is impossible to solve the problem of our own destiny with the same way of thinking that created the problem. It is the obligation of each individual through his or her creative life cycle to give more back to civilization, and to improve upon the civilization one knew while growing up. This is the only conscious way to achieve the catharsis of the future.

The basis for these Virus project lies in the mythological continent “Mu”. The continent arose and later disappeared in human history. It was located in the Pacific Ocean inhabited by “refugees from other continents”.

Mirroring events of the past, the Virus project now provides construction of a new continent in the area of the lost continent “Mu”.

Development of a new continent with new advanced technologies, that enable self-sufficiency; with appropriate social order and catarthical purification of inhabited human population; humanity will get a new “embryo” that will spread like a virus, impossible to stop or destroy.

It is said that the ancient “Mu” disappeared when human civilization appeared. Perhaps there was no need for the “Mu” after the conceptual human appeared? Now it is returning to help us find the right way….

pr7_slika1

Lost civilizations: Atlantis, Mu, Mayan Calendar …

More info:

Mu- lost continent

Mu, as a lost Pacific Ocean continent, was later popularised by James Churchward (1851–1936) in a series of books, beginning with Lost Continent of Mu, the Motherland of Man (1926),[2]re-edited later as The Lost Continent Mu (1931).[8] Other popular books in the series are The Children of Mu (1931), and The Sacred Symbols of Mu (1933).

Churchward claimed that “more than fifty years ago,” while he was a soldier in India, he befriended a high-ranking temple priest who showed him a set of ancient “sunburnt” clay tablets, supposedly in a long lost “Naga-Maya language” which only two other people in India could read. Having mastered the language himself, Churchward found out that they originated from “the place where [man] first appeared—Mu.” The 1931 edition states that “all matter of science in this work are based on translations of two sets of ancient tablets:” the clay tables he read in India, and a collection of 2,500 stone tablets that had been uncovered by William Niven in Mexico.[8]: p. 7

Churchward gave a vivid description of Mu as the home of an advanced civilization, the Naacal, which flourished between 50,000 and 12,000 years ago, was dominated by a “white race,”[8]: p. 48 and was “superior in many respects to our own”[8]: p. 17 At the time of its demise, about 12,000 years ago, Mu had 64,000,000 inhabitants and many large cities, and colonies in the other continents.

Churchward claimed that the landmass of Mu was located in the Pacific Ocean, and stretched east–west from the Marianas to Easter Island, and north–south from Hawaii to Mangaia. He claimed that according to the creation myth he read in the Indian tablets, Mu had been lifted above sea level by the expansion of underground volcanic gases. Eventually Mu “was completely obliterated in almost a single night”[8]: p. 44: after a series of earthquakes and volcanic eruptions, “the broken land fell into that great abyss of fire” and was covered by “fifty millions of square miles of water.”[8]: p. 50

Churchward claimed that Mu was the common origin of the great civilizations of Egypt, Greece, Central America, India, Burma and others, including Easter Island, and was in particular the source of ancient megalithic architecture. As evidence for his claims, he pointed to symbols from throughout the world, in which he saw common themes of birds, the relation of the Earth and the sky, and especially the Sun. Churchward claims the king of Mu was Ra and he relates this to the Egyptian god of the sun, Ra, and the Rapanui word for Sun, ra’a, which he incorrectly spells “raa.”[8]: p. 48 He claimed to have found symbols of the Sun in “Egypt, Babylonia, Peru and all ancient lands and countries – it was a universal symbol.”[8]: p. 138

Churchward attributed all megalithic art in Polynesia to the people of Mu. He claimed that symbols of the sun are found “depicted on stones of Polynesian ruins,” such as the stone hats (pukao) on top of the giant moai statues of Easter Island. Citing W.J. Johnson, Churchward describes the cylindrical hats as “spheres” that “seem to show red in the distance”, and asserts that they “represent the Sun as Ra.”[8]: p. 138 He also incorrectly claimed that some of them are made of “red sandstone”[8]: p. 89 which does not occur in the island. The platforms on which the statues rest (ahu) are described by Churchward as being “platform-like accumulations of cut and dressed stone,” which were supposedly left in their current positions “awaiting shipment to some other part of the continent for the building of temples and palaces.”[8]: p. 89 He also cites the pillars “erected by the Māori of New Zealand” as an example of this lost civilization’s handiwork.[8]: p. 158 In Churchward’s view, the present-day Polynesians are not descendants of the dominant members of the lost civilization of Mu, responsible for these great works, but survivors of the cataclysm that adopted “the first cannibalism and savagery” in the world.[8]: p. 54

This entry was posted in Acquatecture, eco architecture, Green architecture, Green Building, Politicians and Architecture, Politics, sustainable architecture, Tourist resort and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment